Tag Archive for: General

The five-domains update

Sea state  

The UK Ministry of Defence has awarded a 10-year contract worth £270 million to British multinational BAE Systems to support the Royal Navy’s three main radar systems: Artisan, Sampson and Long Range Radar. Under the contract, BAE Systems engineers will upgrade and provide maintenance support for radars on navy ships. The minister for defence procurement said that the contract will boost investment in the UK’s supply chain and let adversaries know that the UK is ‘equipped, prepared and ready’.

Royal Australian Navy divers have assisted the Australian Border Force, Australian Federal Police and Western Australian Police Force in a joint operation to seize about 800 kilograms of cocaine from a merchant vessel off the WA coast. The divers found 29 packages of the drug submerged in a water-filled ballast tank while the ship was detained at a berth at Kwinana in Perth’s south. The Defence Department said that the operation showcased the navy’s ability to ‘enhance maritime security, deter illegal activity at sea and protect national interests’ through close cooperation with Australian partners.

Flight path

The Indonesian Air Force will receive a second-hand fleet of 12 Dassault Mirage 2000-5 fighters by January 2025. The French-made jets were bought by Qatar in 1997 and will be sold on to Indonesia in a $1.1 billion deal financed by foreign loans. The sale is intended to plug a capability gap ahead of the introduction of 42 Dassault Rafale fighters in 2026. The decision also marks a reduction in Indonesia’s historical reliance on Russian military equipment, following the imposition of sanctions on Moscow after the invasion of Ukraine last year.

French aerospace company Dassault Aviation will introduce two new key capabilities to its ‘Super Rafale’ F5 program under France’s 2024–2030 military budget bill. According to an amendment tabled in the French parliament, the Rafale F5 will be paired with loyal wingman combat drones from the nEUROn program. The sixth-generation fighter will also be equipped with joint jamming radars and self-defence systems in a bid to challenge the air superiority and market dominance of Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Lightning II.

Rapid fire

Additional NATO troops have been deployed to northern Kosovo following a surge in unrest that left more than 30 NATO soldiers injured. Violence escalated this month after ethnic Albanians were appointed as mayors in Serb-majority areas through an election boycotted by Serbs. The NATO-led peacekeeping mission Kosovo Force, deployed since 1999, now consists of around 4,200 troops. The majority of the reinforcements come from the Turkish Army’s 65th Mechanised Infantry Brigade Command.

African Union officials and Somali authorities have announced that the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS) will withdraw 2,000 soldiers by the end of this month, aiming to conclude the mission completely by December 2024. ATMIS was formed in 2022 to replace the African Union Mission to Somalia that started in 2007. Concerns have been raised that a withdrawal of African Union troops could lead to a collapse of state institutions and spark a remobilisation of the Islamist insurgent group al-Shabaab.

Final frontier

South Korea has recovered part of a rocket used in North Korea’s failed attempt to launch its first military satellite last month. Military personnel salvaged a large cylindrical object from the sea last week and are continuing the search for additional objects. South Korea is investigating the debris alongside the US. One question it is hoping to answer is North Korea’s proclaimed name for the rocket—an anomalous label on the top of the rocket is missing a syllable.

Russia has announced that it has enhanced its ability to track and detect foreign spacecraft. The Russian defence minister was briefed about the capability contained at a new military facility by the commander of the Russian Space Forces. Russia’s drive for stronger space surveillance capabilities reflects its growing emphasis on space as a domain for military activities. These latest advancements in tracking and identifying space objects will likely bolster Russia’s situational awareness in space.

Wired watchtower

Russia-linked ransomware gang BlackCat, also known as AlphV or AlphaSpider, has claimed responsibility for an attack on major Australian law firm HWL Ebsworth, whose clients include 40 Australian government departments and agencies. The hackers reportedly obtained files on the redevelopment of the secret Woomera missile testing site, the Australian navy’s attack helicopter replacement project, and Australia’s Indo-Pacific enhanced engagement strategy. The government has established a crisis group to investigate what Commonwealth information is among the 4 terabytes of stolen data.

The UK has pledged an additional $47 million in funding for Ukraine to help the embattled country shore up its cyber defences. The support builds on the foreign secretary’s prior commitment of $12 million for the UK’s Ukraine cyber program. The funds are intended to bolster Ukraine’s ability to detect and disable Russian malware targeting critical infrastructure. The announcement follows an uptick in Russian cyberattacks and Ukraine’s ascension to NATO’s Cyber Defense Center, a move Kyiv said was ‘a step on the way’ to NATO membership.

AUKUS: three partners, two pillars, one problem

Much of the AUKUS discussion to date has focused on Pillar 1, the trilateral effort to support Australia acquiring conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines. Yet achieving Pillar 2, the technology programs, is arguably both of greater long-term value and more strategically challenging. Pillar 2 aims to enhance the US, UK and Australia’s technological edge—and, implicitly, to counter China’s technological advancements—by pooling resources in advanced military capability areas such as artificial intelligence, quantum computing, cyber technology, undersea capabilities, hypersonics and counter-hypersonics, electronic warfare, and information-sharing.

As China and others continue to make significant technological advances and invest heavily in emerging technologies, AUKUS countries cannot afford to regard the AUKUS pillars as sequential. Pillar 1 is some decades away: Pillar 2 is here and now and already promises to have wide-ranging effects on national security.

ASPI’s Critical Technology Tracker, released in March, revealed that China has laid the research foundations to position itself as the world’s leading science and technology superpower. It has established a sometimes stunning lead in high-impact researchan important indicator clearly linked to technological breakthroughs and commercialisation—across 36 out of 44 critical technologies in defence, robotics, energy, biotechnology, advanced materials and other key fields.

Understandably, AUKUS partners have offered scant detail on specific technologies that underpin Pillar 2. Advanced military capabilities are not typically discussed in the public domain. Some research into AUKUS related technologies will likely never appear in public records. However, most of the means and tools to innovate and accelerate Pillar 2 are largely civilian. They sit outside defence in industry or academic institutions, such as Google, the global leader on natural language processing research. In that context, it makes sense to try to identify technologies most relevant to Pillar 2, and to map those countries and research institutions who hold advantage.

Our new AUKUS Pillar 2 focused research ranks 23 technologies (seven of them new to the Tech Tracker) that, in our view, will be highly relevant to Pillar 2 advanced capability areas. The AUKUS related findings reveal an even starker gap between countries than our original findings. AUKUS related critical technologies are a two-horse race between China and the US, with various other nations—most often India—a distant third. That race appears far from equal. China holds a convincing lead in 19 of the 23 technologies evaluated. It dominates in hypersonics, electronic warfare and autonomous underwater vehicles, as well as in research into sonar and acoustic sensors. In each of these technologies, China’s output of high-impact research is at least three times greater than that of the US. It still holds a comfortable lead when compared to all three AUKUS countries combined.

(Extract from AUKUS RELEVANT TECHNOLOGIES: Top 10 country snapshot.)

China also leads, although by a narrower margin, on advanced cyber technologies, advanced robotics, post-quantum cryptography and quantum communications. The field is split on AI and autonomy technologies: China is further ahead in advanced data analytics, AI algorithms and hardware accelerators, adversarial AI and drones. For the time being, the US maintains its strength in quantum computing (18.9% ahead of China), but its lead on AI technologies such as advanced integrated circuit design and natural language processing, is almost too close to call—the margin is less than 3%. Quantum sensors really is too close to call, with the US ahead by a mere 0.4%.

ASPI also looked at where leading institutions are based, and where their talent comes from. For some technologies, at least nine of the world’s top 10 research institutions are based in China (for autonomous underwater vehicles it is all of the top 10), and they are collectively generating eight times more high-impact research papers than the second-ranked country (the US in all cases). Chinese defence universities feature regularly: China’s National University of Defense Technology leads in electronic warfare and advanced aircraft engines; the Chinese Academy of Sciences is prolific on technologies such as coatings, air-independent propulsion and data analytics; and Harbin Engineering University is a leader on sonar and acoustic seniors and autonomous underwater vehicles.

These results require some caveats and interpretation. First, Pillar 2 is about emerging technologies, and the sample size of research papers is smaller in some of these emerging technologies than for more established techs. Second, research should be seen in the broader context of development and delivery. In some cases, a country may be further ahead on research because it leads across the entire value chain of a particular technology (research, commercialisation, manufacturing, supply). This applies, for example, to China’s huge leads in electric batteries and in hypersonics). In some cases though, a research lead may represent concerted effort by universities, national labs and companies to catch up. For example, China’s excellent research performance in advanced aircraft engines is not yet reflected in real world production, but an effort to address an identified vulnerability—its almost total reliance on US and Swedish companies for the precision-grade stainless steel needed for high performance aircraft engine bearings. Finally, research investment can take time to bear fruit in the form of publications. China’s purported $15.3b funding for quantum technologies (2021-2025) is more than double that of EU governments and more than eight times the amount committed by the US, but the Technology Tracker, as a snapshot of research to date, does not yet reflect that investment boost.

Despite such caveats, the results are striking. The current concentration of expertise is likely to result in breakout capability and technology monopoly risk, underscoring the need for AUKUS countries to rapidly deepen their collaboration to ensure future freedom of action, including through access to trusted, secure critical technology supply chains. Combined, AUKUS countries would assume a slim lead in certain undersea capabilities research, such as autonomous systems operations technology and advanced robotics. AUKUS would also nudge ahead of China on advanced cyber technologies such as adversarial AI and protective cybersecurity technologies. While there are some early indicators that such collaboration is underway significant challenges (well-documented elsewhere) remain.

China’s lead is so great across a number of technology areas that no aggregation of countries exceeds its share. A slightly larger grouping of countries would improve the picture though. AUKUS is a technology-sharing agreement, rather than a military alliance. It does not necessarily preclude its members from collaborating—individually or collectively—on accelerated tech development or transfer with traditional Five Eyes partners such as Canada (top 10 in 15 of the 24 technologies) or more recent groupings such as the Quad (Japan’s strengths lie in hypersonics and quantum technologies, while India sits in the top 10 for all 24 technologies).

Australia punches above its weight in areas like quantum, AI and cyber (including in the new category of ‘adversarial AI-reverse engineering’, where we rank no.3 in the world), but as the smallest member of the arrangement it should actively pursue all options to secure ongoing access to AUKUS Pillar 2 technologies. As we argue in our recommendations, to do so it will likely need both to build—establishing an investment and taxation framework that nurtures talent pipelines for students and technologists at the forefront of critical technology research, and drives commercialisation—as well as buy, developing global partnerships, through ‘friend-shoring’ and R&D grants between like-minded countries that play to Australia’s strengths.

The threat spectrum

Planet A

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock has urged countries to set a global renewable energy target to substantially limit emissions and keep global warming to 1.5° Celsius, terming the climate crisis the ‘greatest security challenge of our century’. Speaking at the 14th Petersberg Climate Dialogue, Baerbock referred to the International Energy Agency’s estimates that global renewable energy capacity needs to triple to successfully limit warming. The conference lays the groundwork for the UN Climate Change Conference, COP-28, in Dubai at the end of this year.

Baerbock underlined that while G7 countries have already pledged to accelerate their clean energy transitions and renewable energy capacities, the situation demands a global treaty. Codifying existing commitments in a treaty that binds states to their words is critical given that the G7’s commitment from April doesn’t set any new deadlines on phasing out coal power. Importantly, Germany’s ambitious but necessary call for action comes in the context of an altered regional energy landscape following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Democracy watch

Human Rights Watch released a 107-page report last week condemning the Peruvian government’s reaction to protests that erupted last December after the impeachment and arrest of then-president Pedro Castillo. The report stated that Peruvian security forces used ‘brutal, indiscriminate and disproportionate’ force to quash the protests by thousands of people and left nearly 70 dead between December 2022 and February 2023.

Mostly rural workers and Indigenous people in the south of Peru took to the streets in the largest protests in over a generation. The protestors’ demands included calls for a new election, the dissolution of Congress, and the resignation of current president Dina Boluarte, who was previously vice president. The protests come amid ongoing political turmoil and deepened concerns over the erosion of the rule of law and democratic institutions.

Information operations

Pervasive cyber threats from China are unlikely to subside according to FBI Director Christopher Wray, who told a Congressional committee Chinese hackers outnumber bureau agents by ‘at least 50 to one’. The claim highlights the scale of the challenge in cyberspace, particularly from China, and informs the agency’s request for nearly US$63 million to fund 192 new cyber specialist positions. Concerns about state-sponsored espionage pervade the US-Australia alliance, with a ‘significant increase’ recorded in Chinese cyberattacks against both countries after details emerged of the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact.

Australia’s Defence Strategic Review identified staff shortages in a similar context. The DSR found that the Chief Information Officer Group, one of the most complex ICT networks in Australia, is ‘too reliant on individual contractors’. This is a major limitation for cybersecurity. The review called for closer collaboration between the ADF and the Australian Signals Directorate and a rebalanced 60:40 staff-to-contractors ratio for both the ADF and the public service. This would support efforts to make Australia the ‘most cybersecure country’ in the world by 2030.

Follow the money

The European Commission has reached an in-principle agreement to allow the transit of Ukrainian grain to resume through Poland, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia and Bulgaria. The five eastern European neighbours unilaterally halted agrifood imports in April amid an oversupply of cheap Ukrainian grain they say puts local producers at a disadvantage. Fearing devastating financial and job losses, farmers took to the streets to demand assistance and the re-introduction of tariffs and other trade duties on Ukrainian cereals.

The bans forced the commission to intervene, promising ‘preventive measures’ to address the situation and a US$165 million package to compensate farmers. The temporary resolution comes as Russia threatens to withdraw from the Black Sea deal, which enables the export of grain from Ukrainian ports onto the world market, and members of the G7 pledge to intensify sanctions on Moscow. This dynamic raises questions over how long the commission can maintain solidarity with war-torn Ukraine while balancing the competing needs of its member states.

Terror byte

Iranian judges have retaliated against US courts’ findings that blame Iran for promoting terrorism by accusing US entities and officials, and former presidents Barack Obama and George W Bush, of ‘creating’ the Islamic State terror group.

The Iranian judgement calls on the US government to pay US$313 million as compensation for the 2017 attacks in Tehran by Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. This amount includes compensation for financial, ‘moral’, and ‘punitive’ damages. Other parties include US Central Command, the Central Intelligence Agency, and weapons manufacturer Lockheed Martin.

The judges said the ruling was a response to US findings on Iran’s role in terrorist attacks which include calls for Iran to pay billions of dollars in compensation. The judgement follows an International Court of Justice ruling on a 2016 attempt by Tehran to unfreeze Iranian assets held by US courts to pay compensation to victims of terrorist attacks. The ICJ found that some of these freezes were illegal and ordered the US to pay compensation. However, the Court stated it did not have jurisdiction to rule over the freezing of US$1.57 billion in assets owned by Iran’s central bank.

The five-domains update

Sea state

HMAS Anzac has deployed to Southeast Asia supporting the international effort to enforce UN Security Council sanctions on North Korea. The lead ship of the Royal Australian Navy’s six Anzac-class frigates will participate in two major interoperability exercises: Bersama Shield between Australia, Malaysia, New Zealand, Singapore and the United Kingdom, and Exercise Lumbas between the RAN and the Philippine Navy.

Australians could see changes to these and other long-running continuous engagements in the region following the release of the Defence Strategic Review (DSR). The review says major exercises must ‘be informed by and reflect Australia’s strategic, operational and preparedness requirements’. The goal is to ensure that exercises ‘build preparedness including minimum viable improvements in key areas’. That will now include a strong focus on deterrence. Changes may start from 2024, when the Anzacs will be equipped with Naval Strike Missiles giving their armament greater range and lethality.

Flight Path

A leaked US military assessment has revealed that China is rapidly improving its ability to target US warships and regional military bases to make it harder for the Americans to intervene in the event of an invasion of Taiwan. China’s imminent deployment of high-altitude spy drones, capable of flying at three times the speed of sound, would substantially increase its surveillance capabilities. That could provide real-time mapping data to improve the accuracy of missile strikes, and other quality intelligence. The assessment reveals more about China’s spy balloons and also raises concerns about Taiwan’s vulnerability to early Chinese aerial dominance in the event of an invasion.

The Royal Australian Air Force has acquired three Defence Deployable Air Traffic Management and Control Systems (DDATMCS) to bolster its expeditionary capability and airspace management. These systems manage en-route air traffic and facilitate swift deployment through air, land, or sea for short-term operations, such as humanitarian aid and disaster relief. The DDATMCS technology ensures the safe regulation of airspace and airfields during war or disaster, particularly when in areas where there is no infrastructure, or where infrastructure had been damaged.

Rapid Fire

The DSR sets new force structure priorities for the Army, which will now be ‘optimised for littoral operations in our northern land and maritime spaces and provide a long-range strike capability’. This restructure is deemed necessary for the Army to support an ‘integrated force’ operating across the land, sea, air, space and cyber domains. Efforts to create an ‘amphibious-capable combined-arms land system’ in Australia’s north may involve deeper integration between the Australian Army and the US Marines’ newly established littoral regiments which are part of Marine Rotational Force-Darwin.

Meanwhile, Ukraine has received the US-made Patriot surface-to-air guided missiles Washington agreed to send last October. The truck-mounted launching system targets enemy aircraft, ballistic missiles and cruise missiles and consists of eight launchers that can hold up to four missile interceptors each, a ground radar, a control station and a generator. The capability should provide a major boost to Kyiv ahead of its planned counter-offensive in which some 40,000 soldiers are expected to take part.

Final Frontier

US Space Command has signed an enhanced memorandum of understanding with Australia’s Defence Space Command that ‘deepens military cooperation in the space domain’. The non-legally binding agreement seeks to improve interoperability and coordination between the US and Australia in space with the collective aim of maintaining freedom of action there. Key focus areas reportedly include force development, combined training, academic and professional education opportunities, modernisation and future capabilities development, and enhanced information sharing. This agreement comes alongside US attempts to engage with other allies including Italy and Peru to help maintain a safe space environment as threats there grow more potent.

North Korea has reportedly built its first military spy satellite that its leader, Kim Jong Un, says would enable it to use preemptive military force. Un said a constellation of such satellites was necessary to strengthen his country’s intelligence capabilities, especially to counter ‘threats’ from the US and South Korea. As North Korea endeavours to advance its space program, the US has bolstered its military presence with the activation of US Space Forces Korea which will provide warning of missile attacks and improve satellite communications.

Wired Watchtower

A leaked US intelligence report claims that China is building cyber weapons to hijack enemy satellites and control critical communications in wartime. The weapons would disable enemy surveillance or communications satellites by mimicking signals received from their operators or causing them to malfunction during pivotal moments. Rapid developments highlight the importance China is placing on information surveillance and control in the event of war. Taiwan is seeking to build a resilient communications infrastructure that could withstand such attacks from China.

The Quad countries of US, Australia, Japan and India are aiming to create a system of information-sharing on cyber attacks that target critical infrastructure. This would enable cyber sections of all four governments to immediately share information with each other on cyber attacks, helping develop better defence mechanisms. This builds on the countries’ 2022 commitment to enhance cyber cooperation and relates to the call in Australia’s DSR for much stronger cyber capabilities. The review recognised cyber and information threats as one of the government’s five strategic priorities.

 

The five-domains update

Sea state

The 2023 edition of Exercise Tasman Shield, held from 17 March to 3 April, brought together aircraft from the Royal Australian Air Force and ships from the Royal Australian Navy to practise integrated air–maritime missions and enhance the interoperability of sea and air forces. The F-35A Lightning IIs, F/A-18F Super Hornets, EA-18G Growlers, E-7A Wedgetails, P-8A Poseidons, KC-30A tankers and Hawk 127 lead-in fighters tested their ability to work together and with air warfare destroyers HMAS Hobart and HMAS Sydney. Commodore Paul O’Grady noted that the exercise progressed the RAN’s ability to provide aid defence at sea.

The US has sent the submarine USS Florida, capable of carrying more than 150 Tomahawk cruise missiles, into the Red Sea in a show of force in response to attacks on American personnel by Iran-backed groups across the Middle East. The move is part of the broader US effort to increase its military presence in the region amid significant regional developments including rising tensions between Iran and Israel, a thaw in relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and the expanding Russian and Chinese footprint in the region.

Flight path

Israel has conducted air strikes against infrastructure it says is controlled by the Palestinian militant group Hamas in Lebanon and the Gaza Strip. The strikes were a response to rockets being fired into Israel from southern Lebanon and the Gaza Strip. Most were intercepted by Israel’s Iron Dome defence system. The strikes and counterstrikes intensified after Israeli police raids on the al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem on the eve of Ramadan and Passover. Against the backdrop of escalating tensions with Tehran, Israel is reportedly investigating Iran’s involvement in the rocket attacks from Lebanon.

China has simulated precision strikes against Taiwan in an operation it’s calling ‘Joint Sword’. Beijing has described the drills as a ‘stern warning’ to Taiwan following its president’s visit to the US. Taiwan reported that up to 70 Chinese aircraft and 11 Chinese ships encircled the island and conducted simulated attacks on aircraft carrier groups as well as anti-submarine drills. More than 40 Chinese warplanes either crossed the Taiwan Strait median line or entered Taiwan’s air defence identification zone. The drills attracted strong condemnation from Taiwan and are being closely watched by the US, which simultaneously conducted a freedom-of-navigation operation in South China Sea waters claimed by China.

Rapid fire

The Australian Army’s 2nd/14th Light Horse Regiment (Queensland Mounted Infantry) tested the Boxer combat reconnaissance vehicle at last month’s Exercise Damascus. The live-fire and tactical training is intended to prepare the unit for exercises including Talisman Sabre later this year. The Boxer, being delivered by Rheinmetall Defence Australia, will replace the aging ASLAV light armoured vehicle.

Meanwhile, the army’s MRH-90 Taipan helicopter fleet has returned to normal flying operations. The fleet was grounded after an engine failure in March led to a Taipan crashing into Jervis Bay. The accident, which left two Australian Defence Force members with minor injuries, followed a series of groundings and other problems in the helicopter fleet since its acquisition in the mid-2000s.

Final frontier

Lockheed Martin Australia has been selected to build the Australian Defence Force’s next-generation satellite communications system. While a procurement contract is yet to be issued, the announcement means the company has moved to the next phase of negotiations with the government under Joint Project 9102, which aims to provide a sovereign-controlled satellite communication system over the Indo-Pacific ocean region.

Raytheon Australia has launched a program supporting the training of defence space industry workers in Exmouth, Western Australia. The program is designed to keep world-class talent in Exmouth as the strategic naval and space capabilities at the Harold E. Holt precinct become increasingly important. A pipeline of space careers in the region has been created since the relocation from New Mexico of the US-owned space surveillance telescope, which is operated by Australia and used to track debris in space.

Wired watchtower

Hackers from the Russian government and its affiliates are increasingly attacking Ukraine’s information technology systems as part of the war launched by Vladimir Putin. Targets include closed-circuit cameras that public and private entities installed for their own security. The hackers have gained access to webcams, including some mounted in coffee shops, to track the movement of convoys and trains delivering humanitarian aid. Russian operatives have also targeted US defence manufacturers and transport firms to acquire information on the arms supply chain supporting Ukraine.

Israeli agencies holding vital data on the country’s airlines, transport organisations, and postal and irrigation systems are grappling with a surge of cyberattacks. A recent incident resulted in water monitors malfunctioning and scheduled watering being suspended, directly impacting agricultural production. Hacktivist group GhostSec, known for its pro-Palestinian stance, claimed responsibility and said it had infiltrated Israel’s satellite system and water pumps, although its involvement is yet to be verified. Israel’s National Cyber Organisation has warned of impending attacks on Israeli infrastructure during the month Ramadan and in the lead-up to ‘Iranian Jerusalem Day’ on 14 April.

AUKUS is underway, but key challenges remain

The bold and complex plan to supply Australia with nuclear-powered submarines represents a paradigm shift in US strategic thinking on empowering allies, redistributing its forces and better integrating like-minded partners into American supply chains and industrial planning.

The optimal pathway for Australia’s SSN acquisition revealed on Monday in San Diego is a momentous demonstration of the three partners’ commitment to sharing critical technologies under the AUKUS pact. It may well be worth the cost in dollars, effort and diplomatic capital given the spectre of an expansionist and bellicose China.

US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin says the plan ‘will strengthen our combined military capabilities, boost our defense industrial capacity, enhance our ability to deter aggression, and promote our shared goal of a free and open Indo-Pacific … for decades to come’.

Six months ago, we at ASPI DC identified challenges that Australia, the UK and the US would need to address to advance AUKUS. Chief among them was a lack of clarity about AUKUS’s strategic purpose and what each partner aimed to achieve and how the AUKUS narrative would be rolled out to allies, partners and adversaries.

In particular, we noted that there was a dearth of detail on how the AUKUS partners would engage with commercial industry and energise their publics to enable and reap the benefits of the agreement’s second pillar—critical technology sharing beyond the submarine deal.

We posited that these concerns needed to be addressed to ensure public support in the partner countries and the acceptance—if not full endorsement—from regional states concerned about further militarisation of the Indo-Pacific and worried that AUKUS might lead to escalation of conflict rather than stability.

No fair listener should expect three heads of government to provide in-depth details of the plan in a short ceremony; however, the lack of strategic clarity is deafening.

Is AUKUS a demonstration of the US pivot to the region in a way President Joe Biden’s predecessors never imagined? By building this security pact, is the US aiming to show regional partners that it is committed to fostering and maintaining stability in the Indo-Pacific for the region’s benefit? Or is this agreement really all about America’s strategic competition with China and expanding US power?

For Australia, the stated purpose is to respond to China’s rise, Beijing’s increased aggression and the revelation of Australia’s strategic deficit in a tough neighbourhood. But fundamentally, to achieve security, Australia has historically ‘bandwagoned’ with one of the region’s great powers in support of a regional and global order balanced in Australia’s favour. AUKUS is a double-edged sword that may uncomfortably tie Australia to the US and its foreign policy while also reinforcing America’s tether to Australia’s security.

For the UK, AUKUS represents an opportunity to revive a lagging defense industrial base and to prove its continued worth as a prime-time global player capable of an Indo-Pacific tilt. The UK government recently released a refresh of its 2021 integrated review reinforcing these strategic aims.

All three countries say that AUKUS will stabilise the Indo-Pacific, but none of them has yet explained how it will do that.

The partners have yet to articulate why and how AUKUS is in the interests of other Indo-Pacific states. Back in September, we said the deal must register beyond the need for nuclear submarines; as of today, it still hasn’t.

The ABC’s Steven Dziedzic reported that the Australian foreign-policy team spent weeks making dozens of calls to leaders across the region in advance of yesterday’s announcement. No doubt, the US and UK have also engaged with relevant partners.

While this outreach indicates an effort to listen more to regional voices following the surprise announcement of AUKUS in 2021, the narrative requires more work. Canberra, London and Washington must engage in ongoing, explicit conversations with allies and partners about how the deal will produce the stated purpose. So far, AUKUS’s justification has centered on deterrence; however, it isn’t clear how Australia’s acquisition of nuclear submarines will effectively deter China—particularly as only UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak explicitly named China as an adversary. The partners must explain the calculus of why AUKUS won’t lead to nuclear proliferation or conflict escalation through greater militarisation of the region.

Observers are justified in their concerns about whether AUKUS will stabilise the region. The pathway calls for more US port visits, more rotations by US and UK submarines, and, eventually, many more submarines—Australian, British and American—in the waters surrounding Australia. Australian Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles said he saw the need for AUKUS because the region was experiencing the largest military build-up since World War II. Australia, he said, has a duty to respond and shirking the responsibility ‘would see us be condemned by history’. Regional partners are waiting to hear a reassuring story about how AUKUS will affect their interests.

AUKUS will need resources and support from the breadth of society in Australia, the UK and the US. But the optimal pathway announcement says little about relations with commercial industry and less about generating public enthusiasm for paying for pillar 1, the submarines, and kickstarting pillar 2, which is not a government-to-government arrangement and requires public–private sector coordination.

The sticker price for the acquisition of Australia’s submarines is as much as $368 billion over three decades—if it runs to cost, which previous defence spending patterns indicate is highly unlikely. The financial costs to the US and UK are unknown. But given the uncertainty in global markets and in the AUKUS partners’ economies, their publics will need to better understand and accept that the benefits outweigh the costs even if they mean many years of difficult funding choices and painful levels of privation.

In the absence of a geopolitical crisis—such as China invading Taiwan—buy-in from the rank and file in all three countries will likely centre on the creation of training opportunties and jobs for engineers, shipbuilders and submariners. While we don’t yet know the exact details of these programs, Albanese has said that AUKUS will produce at least 20,000 new jobs for Australians over 30 years. However, when broken down, that translates to just 666 jobs per year.

Statements yesterday by the AUKUS leaders barely acknowledged the promises of pillar 2. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese suggested that the SSN ‘will be a catalyst for innovation and research breakthroughs … not just in one field, but right across our advanced manufacturing and technology sectors’. Despite this reference, the announcement doesn’t explain how the partners will engage with the private sector under pillar 2.

AUKUS is progressing, but there’s a long way to go. At the very least, additional announcements will need to clarify the specific objectives AUKUS partners seek to achieve across vastly different technology sectors, with diverse partners and among their own populations.

When disaster strikes, Australia, New Zealand and the US should partner with, not for, the Pacific

Officials from Australia, New Zealand and the United States are set to meet in Canberra this week for the fourth annual Trilateral Pacific Security Cooperation Dialogue. Their goal is to work out how to partner better and smarter in a region that is increasingly contested geopolitically. For the Pacific, the security challenges are stark. Pacific island countries are on the front lines of climate change and increasingly vulnerable to natural disasters.

As Vanuatu starts the long road to recovery from tropical cyclones Judy and Kevin, which hit in quick succession over the past week, it’s an opportune time for Australia, New Zealand and the US to discuss how to improve their collective response to disasters in the region.

Disaster diplomacy has already been on display in Vanuatu, with Australia, New Zealand, France and the UK quick to publicise their contributions. Australia sent its massive landing ship HMAS Canberra on Sunday, and New Zealand is flying in further relief supplies. It remains to be seen whether China, the US and Japan will send assistance, though if the response to the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai volcanic eruption and tsunami in Tonga in January 2022 is an indication, they will. Within the broader context of strategic competition, disasters have come to be seen as opportunities to demonstrate capacity and commitment in the region.

As in the case of Tonga, the response to the Vanuatu cyclones raises key questions about how partners provide their assistance. These questions are pressing because there’s no regional mechanism to coordinate humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR).

The first question relates to how partners coordinate their efforts. During the Tongan disaster, a HADR international coordination cell was established at Australia’s Headquarters Joint Operations Command (HQJOC) to coordinate the contributions of Australia, New Zealand, Fiji, the US, France, the UK and Japan. Tonga, as the affected country, took part. Australia also coordinated with France and New Zealand under the 1992 FRANZ arrangement, which promotes trilateral cooperation in response to natural disasters and facilitates defence cooperation.

The notable absence from the coordination cell was China, which sought to make the presence of its humanitarian response felt, but without direct coordination with other partners. This resulted in competition for pier-side support, access to tarmacs and flight scheduling, and meant that the equipment donated was not quality-controlled. Today, 75 eight-tonne inappropriate and unwanted one-bedroom prefabricated homes donated by China sit gathering salt spray on the wharf in Nuku’alofa.

Prefabricated shelters donated by China to Tonga sit unused on the wharf in Nuku’alofa more than a year after the Hunga Tonga–Hunga Ha’apai volcanic eruption and tsunami. Image courtesy of Henrietta McNeill (2023).

The FRANZ arrangement is again being used to coordinate assistance to Vanuatu from Australia, New Zealand (as chair) and France. What’s not clear is whether the coordination cell mechanism will be reactivated to coordinate the wider range of partners seeking to assist.

And it’s unlikely that China, should it mount a response, will seek to coordinate with other partners—or that they would be receptive if it did. China highlighted its intention to have more involvement in HADR, which it included in its proposed but unsuccessful regional economic and security pact in 2022. The establishment of a disaster management cooperation mechanism for Pacific island countries, the launch of the China–Pacific Island Countries Center for Disaster Risk Reduction Cooperation and the proposed China–Pacific Island Countries subcenter for marine disaster risk reduction cooperation all reflect Chinese interests in establishing alternative HADR mechanisms. This will further complicate multilateral HADR responses.

The second question relates to how well partners coordinate their responses with the Vanuatu government. As has long been known, and was again demonstrated in the Tongan response and the 2020 response to Cyclone Harold in Vanuatu, local leadership of HADR is critical. As Sione Taumoefolau, secretary general of the Tonga Red Cross Society, noted at a workshop we organised on security cooperation in the Pacific islands in November last year, it was Tongan civil-society organisations and local community groups that had the skills and knowledge to ensure that assistance reached where it was needed.

At the same workshop, Air Commodore David Hombsch, from HQJOC, who was involved in the first coordination cell, commented that the cell was vital to rapidly delivering a maximum amount of humanitarian assistance. He said he hoped that the next time the cell was activated it would be based in the affected country, if possible, rather than in Canberra.

The response to the Vanuatu cyclones seems like a good opportunity to implement this suggestion. Vanuatu has a well-developed and experienced National Disaster Management Office which is ideally placed to house the cell.

Looking beyond the immediate response, as Wallis and Powles argue in an upcoming ASPI special report, rather than leaving coordination of HADR to mechanisms created on an ad hoc basis, partner countries should offer to help the Pacific Islands Forum establish a permanent Pacific coordinating centre for HADR. Discussions are underway to develop this capability as part of the review of regional architecture.

It will be important that any Pacific coordinating centre doesn’t replicate the dynamics of the Partners in the Blue Pacific initiative. That mechanism was launched by Australia, New Zealand, the US, Japan and the UK in June 2022 to coordinate their efforts in the region. Canada, Germany and South Korea joined later. But the initiative initially sidelined the Pacific Islands Forum and only belatedly sought to engage with forum senior officials and Pacific foreign ministers in September.

If Pacific island countries agree that a regional coordination centre is needed, it must be Pacific-led. To help facilitate this, it could sit within the Pacific Islands Forum, building on the success of the Pacific Humanitarian Pathway on COVID-19, and represent the core of the regional disaster response system. One of its roles could be to coordinate multi-stakeholder HADR in response to acute natural disasters. It could also provide services to national governments between disasters to enhance their disaster preparedness and response capacities, including strengthening national disaster management offices and ensuring coherence and coordination between the national and regional levels.

A Pacific coordinating centre would require resources, and this is where partners such as Australia, New Zealand and others can play the most important role—providing funding and logistical support to the forum to establish and maintain these initiatives. Recognising that the most effective HADR responses are led and undertaken by the people affected by disasters, partners should focus on identifying ways to facilitate locally led HADR, including through logistical assistance and the forward-positioning of relief supplies throughout the region. As Wallis and Powles argue in their report, this could also mean formally expanding HADR mechanisms such as the FRANZ and Quad arrangements to include Pacific responders.

This week’s dialogue is an opportunity to take stock of how Australia, New Zealand and the US partner with—not for—the Pacific. The Partners in the Blue Pacific Initiative offers several important and immediate lessons, not all of them positive.

Countering China’s coercive diplomacy

‘We treat our friends with fine wine, but for our enemies we have shotguns.’

— Gui Congyou (桂从友), former Chinese ambassador to Sweden, 2019

The People’s Republic of China is increasingly using a range of economic and non-economic tools to punish, influence and deter foreign governments. Coercive actions have become a key part of the PRC’s toolkit as it takes a more assertive position on its ‘core interests’ in its foreign relations and seeks to reshape the global order in its favour.

A new ASPI report, Countering China’s coercive diplomacy: prioritising economic security, sovereignty and the rules-based order, finds that the PRC’s use of such tactics is now sitting at levels well above those seen a decade ago. The year 2020 marked a peak, and the use of trade restrictions and threats from official state sources have proven the most favoured methods. Coercive tactics have been used in disputes over governments’ decisions on human rights, national security and diplomatic relations.

Over the past three years, the Chinese government has used coercive economic and non-economic tactics against at least 19 countries. The dominance of trade restrictions, followed by state-issued threats, reflects the PRC’s abuse of its global trading power and its exploitation of state-controlled media and ‘wolf-warrior diplomacy’.

Australia was the most targeted country as the PRC mounted a wide-ranging coercive campaign following a deterioration in bilateral relations, especially over Canberra’s call for an independent inquiry into the origins of Covid-19. Lithuania was the next most targeted, primarily because of the opening of a ‘Taiwanese representative office’ in Vilnius. In the dataset, Taiwan was the most common issue in disputes triggering coercive actions.

Advanced economic modelling, applied to this issue for the first time in a public research report, demonstrates how a flexible economy allows a state to be resilient and resist coercion. Markets adapt and sectors targeted by economic coercion can recover strongly as a result.

The PRC’s tactics have had mixed success in affecting the policies of target governments; most have stood firm, but some have acquiesced. Undeniably, the tactics are harming certain businesses, challenging sovereign decision-making and weakening economic security. The tactics undermine the rules-based international order and probably serve as a deterrent to governments, businesses and civil-society groups that have witnessed the PRC’s coercion of others and don’t want to become future targets. This can mean that decision-makers, fearing that punishment, are failing to protect key interests, to stand up for human rights or to align with other states on important regional and international issues.

Governments must pursue a deterrence strategy that seeks to change the PRC’s thinking on coercive tactics by reducing the perceived benefits and increasing the costs. The strategy should be based on policies that build deterrence in three forms: resilience, denial and punishment. This strategy should be pursued through national, minilateral and multilateral channels.

Building resilience is essential to counter coercion, but it isn’t a complete solution, so we must look at interventions that enhance deterrence by denial and punishment. States must engage in national efforts to build deterrence but, alone, it’s unlikely that they’ll prevail against more powerful aggressors, so working collectively with like-minded partners and in multilateral institutions is necessary. It’s essential that effective strategic communications accompany these efforts.

The report makes 24 policy recommendations. It recommends, for example, better cooperation between government and business and efforts to improve the World Trade Organization. The report argues that a crucial—and currently missing—component of the response is for a coalition of like-minded states to establish an international taskforce on countering coercion. The taskforce members should agree on the nature of the problem, commit to assisting each other, share information and map out potential countermeasures to deploy in response to coercion. Solidarity between like-minded partners is critical for states to overcome the power differential and divide-and-conquer tactics that the PRC exploits in disputes. Japan’s presidency of the G7 presents an important opportunity to advance this kind of cooperation in 2023.

China’s militarisation of meteorological balloons

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs was quick to claim that a spy balloon breaching US territorial airspace and flying close enough to military sites to monitor them was ‘a civilian airship used for research, mainly meteorological, purposes’ that had accidentally wandered off course. Pentagon officials and the US intelligence community dismissed that claim and linked the balloon to a ‘vast surveillance program’ run by the People’s Liberation Army Air Force, partly operating out of Hainan province on China’s south coast.

Beijing’s spy balloon is a clear example of an emerging technology developed for military and intelligence operations but that crucially evolved out of civilian and scientific programs. One company that is a strong candidate for contributing to the development of the balloon—and certainly works on similar technology that it supplies to the PLA—is a Shenzhen-based metamaterials company, Kuang-Chi, which has also been sanctioned by the US government for human rights abuses in China.

Open-source documents and media reports about China’s balloon-technology programs contain sober lessons about Beijing’s incremental acquisition of foreign intellectual property and its technology partnerships with Western research institutions. This in turn highlights the difficulty in assessing dual-use technologies and serves as a reminder that Western countries need to review their scientific and commercial collaborations to ensure that those arrangements don’t allow an adversary to deploy those capabilities against their interests.

To analyse the value that China’s military leadership attaches to balloons and the near-space region (between 20 and 100 kilometres above the earth’s surface), it’s important to understand Beijing’s strategic intent and the resources it has allocated to such capabilities. Various Chinese government documents indicate that meteorological balloons, and other stratospheric airships, are important to the PLA’s aerospace strategy.

China’s 14th Five-Year Plan for National Economic and Social Development and Long-Range Objectives for 2035 lists aerospace technology (空天科技) as a frontier area of research where Beijing is deepening military–civilian collaboration to improve China’s military and economic strength and ensure the nation achieves its ‘centennial military building goal’ by 2027. As an example, a project titled ‘The high-resolution earth observation system’ (中国高分辨率对地观测系统), which includes near-space systems, is one of China’s 16 primary science and technology projects. This highlights the strategic significance of unmanned aerial vessels for Beijing.

Only three major organisations in China have the capabilities to operate a balloon of the type and size spotted over North America. According to a US State Department official, one of those organisations, the PLA, likely uses balloons for military intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance. The Financial Times has suggested, based on footage of the craft, that they could potentially carry warheads.

The other two organisations are the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), which had an overall annual budget of US$24 billion in 2022—though only a few institutes within the organisation work directly on balloon research programs—and the China Meteorological Administration (CMA), which had an annual budget of US$5.8 billion in 2022.

Both of these civilian government departments are involved in ‘military-civil fusionprojects and collaborate with the PLA. In October 2017, the CAS began a military–civilian project to build China’s first scientific experiment system to conduct astrobiological experiments, monitor the weather and measure electromagnetic radiation in the near-space region. According to the Project 2049 Institute, the CMA also has potential capabilities for military intelligence collection and surveillance. In 2019, the CMA implemented a 15-year plan for the development of meteorological observation technology, which states that the CMA will increase its military–civil fusion capabilities and develop systems such as a space-based global navigation satellite system reflected signal observer on long-distance, super-pressure balloons, low-orbit satellites and other airships.

The PLA, CAS and CMA have reportedly launched high-altitude balloons from at least four locations: the Da Qaidam region in Qinghai province; Urad Zhongqi Airport; a near-space aerostat experiment base in Inner Mongolia; and a base identified by The War Zone near Bosten Lake, the largest lake in China’s Xinjiang Autonomous Region, which lies next to the Malan atomic test base.

High-resolution images of the Chinese balloon crossing over the US suggest that it’s similar to balloons built by Kuang-Chi. Kuang-Chi was one of the first companies visited by Xi Jinping after he became general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party in 2012. In 2020, the company was sanctioned by the US Commerce Department for enabling ‘wide-scale human rights abuses within China through abusive genetic collection and analysis or high-technology surveillance, and/or facilitat[ing] the export of items by China that aid repressive regimes around the world’.

If and when the US publicly reveals more details about the downed balloon, one question we can hope to see answered is whether Kuang-Chi has been using new metamaterials to develop military-use balloons for the PLA. Most scientific balloons, including the type used by CAS for research, remain afloat for between a couple of hours and a few days. The flight time for a journey from China to halfway around the globe and back suggests that the balloon over the US was a ‘super-pressure balloon’ (see table 1) made from new metamaterials that can withstand cosmic radiation and extreme conditions while being light enough to carry a heavy payload.

Table 1: Types of balloons

Type Zero-pressure balloon Zero-pressure, long-distance balloon Super-pressure balloon
Travelling distance Up to 1,000 km Up to 2, 200 km At least 36,000 km
Flying duration 2 hours to 3 days 4 to 6 days 100 days or more
Payload weight Up to 3,000 kg Up to 3,000 kg Up to 1,000 kg
Flying altitude 20–40 km 36–38 km Up to 34 km
Who has it in China Chinese Academy of Sciences,
China Meteorological Administration
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kuang-Chi Kuang-Chi

Source: ASPI analysis of NASA data.

Only a few civilian and military research teams have access to this technology in China. A search of patents shows that Harbin Institute of Technology, one of China’s top defence universities, has researched high-altitude balloons using new ‘aircraft skin materials’ to carry more weight and be more durable. Kuang-Chi also claims it was the first company in China to incorporate aircraft skin metamaterial (蒙皮超材料) as part of its balloon ‘Traveller‘ (旅行者) program. Traveller was highlighted by China’s national broadcaster, CCTV, as a critical, innovative Chinese project that was developing super-pressure balloons.

Even if these balloons are used for meteorological research, the type of data they collect has straightforward military applications. Indeed, a PLA policy document in 2016 called for the construction of meteorological infrastructure to be integrated and standardised within the military.

The helium blimps that Kuang-Chi builds can, it claims, capture high-definition images and navigational information such as a ship’s number, registry, latitude and longitude, course and speed. The company suggests its balloons have greater aerial surveillance capacity than traditional surveillance platforms. In 2015, the company’s ‘Cloud’ blimp acquired data from more than 2,000 ships from around 28 countries and regions in the South China Sea (see figure 1). This information would be valuable during a conflict to track an adversary’s warships and would be cheaper and quicker to deploy than satellites. On the other hand, this technology could plug the gap in many states’ maritime domain awareness.

Figure 1: Maritime surveillance data collected by Kuang-Chi ‘Cloud’ blimp in 2015 test flight

Source: Kuang-Chi, internet archive, 6 February 2015.

This evidence is consistent with documents that indicate Beijing’s aim is to militarise the use of high-altitude airships as part of a broader strategy for dominance in the near-space region. Due to the near-space region’s unique geographical advantages, the PLA perceives it as an essential part of the five-dimensional integrated battlefield of land, sea, air, space and electronic warfare. In a 2017 article, PLA researchers argued that the near-space region is becoming another geostrategic domain where other nation-states, including the US, are posturing. The science of military strategy 2020, a capstone document on the PLA’s military strategy, describes the PLA expanding the scope of aircraft to operate in near and deep space. PLA researchers have also argued that the near-space region is essential for integrated aerospace operations where long-duration balloons and uncrewed aerial vehicles play a major role in providing strategic intelligence support.

The PLA’s interest in near space was part of a transformation in its aerospace strategy. Since the 1990s, the PLA Air Force has primarily based its strategy on ‘territorial air defence’ (国土防空), focusing on the aerial defence of mainland China. As PLA warfare doctrine shifted to incorporate more information-warfare concepts, Xu Qiliang, a former vice chairman of the Central Military Commission, proposed a doctrine of ‘integrated aerospace capabilities’ (空天一体) emphasising reconnaissance and early warning, air defence and strategic projection capabilities. In 2014, the Xi administration formally recognised ‘integrated aerospace capabilities’ as a core PLA strategy.

Research into airships in near-space is split between high-speed and low-speed flying objects. Research on high-speed aircraft includes orbital re-entry glider aircraft and hypersonic cruise aircraft. In 2016, the PLA successfully tested its DF-ZF hypersonic glide vehicle in northwestern China, a region quickly becoming popular for military near-space tests.

Research on low-speed aircraft includes ultra-long-endurance drones, stratospheric blimps and high-altitude balloons. In 2017, Kuang-Chi tested its Traveller 3 balloon, which has potential military uses such as data collection, space–ground communication, remote sensing and telemetry. According to the CCTV report, Traveller 3 can transmit real-time information such as GPS location, balloon flying status data, surveillance video and image data to a ground station and has other avionics and flight control equipment for navigation.

In addition to data collection and communication, research is being conducted on the use of near-space airships for PLA offensive operations and support. This includes intercepting near-space hypersonic flying objects, tracking moving targets, and conducting guidance and control of anti-aircraft and anti-missile weapon systems. In April 2022, the Institute of Atmospheric Physics at CAS and a space technology company, Beijing Xingjian Tianhang, were the first in China to successfully launch a rocket from a high-altitude, zero-pressure helium balloon in near space. The stated aim was physics research but the technology would also, in principle, allow other missile-like projectiles to be launched.

The balloon incident over the US serves as a reminder of the risks of international commercial collaboration with Chinese companies on dual-use technologies or  technologies with potential military applications and underscores the need to step up IP protection. The recent history of Kuang-Chi is a revealing case study. The firm was founded by Liu Ruopeng after he was accused of stealing IP from a US Department of Defense–funded laboratory at Duke University. Reportedly, Kuang-Chi has collaborated with companies in the US, Canada and New Zealand.

In 2014, Kuang-Chi signed a memorandum of understanding with a New Zealand aviation management company, Airways, to test near-space flying platforms in New Zealand. The signing was witnessed by Xi and New Zealand Prime Minister Sir John Key (see figure 2). As agreed in the memorandum and a later contract with Airways, Kuang-Chi successfully launched China’s first near-space balloon flight in June 2015 from a dairy farm in New Zealand owned by a Chinese company, Shanghai Pengxin Group.

An Airways spokesperson told ASPI that ‘the contract with Kuang-Chi Science Limited was to provide air traffic control services for the launch of one test balloon from New Zealand in June 2015’ and that it has done ‘no subsequent work with the company’. The spokesperson rejected any characterisation of the air traffic control service as ‘a collaboration with Chinese firms on dual-use technologies’. The testing of a launch capability for balloons is a necessary part of developing a balloon program. The data and experience collected from the New Zealand launch would have contributed in this sense to China’s military balloon program.

This underscores the need for governments, companies, research institutions and individuals to undertake due diligence when they are collaborating or contracting with foreign entities.

Figure 2: Kuang-Chi signed a memorandum with New Zealand Airways on 21 November 2014

Source: Kuang-Chi, internet archive, 18 March 2015. Chinese President Xi Jinping is pictured on the left, followed by New Zealand Prime Minister John Key. Second from the right is Liu Ruopeng, chair of the board of directors of Kuang-Chi.

According to Sinologist Anne-Marie Brady—who has previously highlighted Kuang-Chi’s use of New Zealand for space launches—New Zealand has been one of many targets of Beijing’s economic and political influence in the Pacific to increase its clout and drive a wedge in the Five Eyes alliance (UK, US, Australia, Canada and NZ), among other reasons. New Zealand’s airspace is also relatively uncongested and the established infrastructure makes it an ideal place to test and launch near-space airships.

Increasing our understanding of Beijing’s capabilities is a top priority, but we also need to continue improving our understanding of Beijing’s strategic intent and the risks of international collaborations in bolstering China’s defence and security capabilities. Kuang-Chi’s apparent civilian collaborations and role as a supplier for Beijing’s military balloon program demonstrate how difficult it can be to assess technologies with potential military applications. This issue has caught out many companies and government officials over the years, including in Australia, Japan and the US. Our public and private sectors need to adapt and ensure the default is not to assist Beijing (or other authoritarian regimes) with dual-use development in critical technologies that affect our national security.

Myanmar’s arrested environmental activism

In the two years since the military coup in February 2021, Myanmar’s natural environment has deteriorated as the embryonic legal and regulatory regime that was emerging during the decade of political and economic reforms has unravelled.

Gold mining has significantly increased, particularly in Kachin and Shan States, causing extensive social and environmental problems. The military has issued new mining permits, and informal or illegal mining has also proliferated, causing deforestation, erosion and flooding while also damaging fisheries by polluting waterways with toxic sediment.

Kachin State is also emerging as a key site for highly polluting rare-earths mining. While the illicit export of rare-earth elements across the border to China has been occurring for years, export activity has boomed since the coup. Attempts by previous governments to regulate these polluted areas have failed since the coup due to a lack of effective oversight. Some of the revenue may be helping the military crush dissent.

But just when Myanmar’s environment needs its defenders the most, environmental activists find themselves facing a plethora of new pressures and security concerns.

Myanmar’s environmental activists, and civil society more broadly, are no strangers to political restrictions. During half a century of earlier authoritarian military rule, activism was largely confined to ethnic ‘liberated areas’ or border zones beyond the reach of the military. This situation began to change during Myanmar’s decade of political and economic reforms starting in 2011, when environmental activists could openly challenge infrastructure projects, mines and government decisions for the first time.

Since the 2021 military coup, the increasingly complex situation in Myanmar has severely affected environmental movements. The safety of activists has become much more perilous under the new and highly restrictive Registration of Associations Law enacted in October 2022. The coup has had three key impacts on Myanmar’s environmental movements—fracturing, fragmentation and transformation.

A process of fracturing has occurred since the collapse of many environmental non-governmental, civil-society and community-based organisations as a result of the coup and the subsequent societal conflict. Some activists have simply abandoned activism due to security concerns, cutting all communication with networks of former colleagues to avoid scrutiny from the security services.

A similar fracturing process occurred after the 2014 Thai coup, which resulted in a dramatic reduction in environmental activism in Thailand. But the impacts of the coup in Myanmar on environmental activism have been significantly larger in proportion to the level of extreme disruption and repression across the entire society.

Environmental movements have also experienced fragmentation since many activists have been forced to relocate for safety reasons. Activists have gravitated towards more liberal spaces beyond the reach of the military regime by fleeing to ‘liberated’ areas run by sympathetic ethnic armed groups or seeking refuge abroad, usually in Thailand, from where they can continue environmental activities through other means.

Fragmentation has also occurred due to the additional difficulties in communication and transport since the coup. Internet shutdowns in various areas have made it hard for networks to remain in contact and many activists have changed their phone numbers for security reasons, making it difficult to reconnect. Even where the internet and mobile connections operate, new restrictions on major social media platforms have disrupted networks. Travel across Myanmar is also much more difficult due to higher costs, limited connections and regular checkpoints. Environmental activists and groups now often work on their own, or network in very limited ways.

Environmental movements have been transformed in a variety of ways since the coup. Activists have adopted new strategies to continue their work inside nominally state-controlled areas of Myanmar. In regions where the military remains largely in control, activists have shifted their work to rural areas where the military’s reach is weaker.

Some environmental activists have changed their role completely by shifting to the provision of humanitarian aid, while others have transitioned from working non-violently to joining the military struggle for democracy under the People’s Defence Force, part of the armed resistance that emerged after the coup, or pre-existing ethnic armed groups.

The ability of activists to openly challenge environmentally destructive activities has virtually evaporated. Activists can appeal to international actors for support, but the influence of international organisations is much reduced. During the decade of reform, civil-society organisations could complain to the international secretariat of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative if the government failed to consider their concerns. After the coup, Myanmar was suspended from the initiative due to political instability. These types of international actors simply no longer have any leverage over Myanmar.

Two years after the coup, with the international community’s attention focused on Ukraine, Myanmar’s environment is experiencing serious degradation and the communities that rely on it for their existence are facing threats to their safety and livelihoods. Meanwhile, Myanmar’s environmental activists who once shined light on these issues now face constant repression and threats to their own security. There is no easy solution, but if even a sliver of the world’s attention and resources that have been expended on Ukraine were directed towards Myanmar instead, finding a way out of the quagmire would seem more likely.