Tag Archive for: Cambodia

The end of the beginning for the Cambodian People’s Party

Cambodia stood between past and future in 2022—balancing completion, new beginnings and legacy creation. As Cambodia’s first electoral term with a one-party National Assembly under the Cambodian People’s Party (CPP) drew to a close, the party prepared for an upcoming generational transition.

In December 2021, Hun Manet was endorsed by his father, Prime Minister Hun Sen, and his party as the country’s future prime minister. A photo of what was allegedly 2023’s young incoming cabinet was circulated. The CPP’s key concern in 2022 was to ensure a transition void of surprises. The scions of the old guard slated to become ministers gained public prominence and power constellations settled around them. Manet raised his profile, including as the head of Central Youth CPP, which gained visibility as its members eagerly displayed their allegiance to the successor-in-waiting.

Manet and his wife Pich Chanmony also implanted the idea of themselves as the country’s future first couple through their leadership of the organisation Samdech Techo Voluntary Youth Doctor Association, which having combated the Covid-19 pandemic celebrated its 10-year anniversary.

The imminent end of an era led by the military fighter (neak tosour) generation of CPP leaders also brought in sight the end of Hun Sen’s rule (Samay Decho), which is likely just a few years away.

Hun Sen sought to build a legacy as peacemaker, who through the ‘win-win policy’ defeated and integrated remaining Khmer Rouge forces by 1998. The ubiquitous slogan ‘thank you peace’ (orkon santhepheap), which cast Cambodia’s everyday normality as attributable to and contingent on Hun Sen’s leadership, referred in equal measure to the 2017 dissolution of the opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party.

Construction of memorials to honour the ‘win-win policy’ began in Anlong Veng and Pailin, complementing another memorial under construction in Koh Kong, as well as Phnom Penh’s larger monument. On 20 June last year, a commemoration ceremony was held in Koh Thmor X-16, where Hun Sen crossed to Vietnam as a young Khmer Rouge commander to gather forces to overthrow the Khmer Rouge regime.

The area was developed during the year, integrating Hun Sen’s entire political career from 1977 into a longer arch of peacemaking in official historiography. Hun Sen’s receipt of the 2022 Sunhak Peace Prize Founder’s Award, presented in Seoul in February, supported the narrative of the Samay Decho as an era of peace.

The resurrection of the Candlelight Party from the ashes of the Sam Rainsy Party raised the possibility of the return to genuine, though severely limited, electoral competition ahead of national elections that are set to be held in 2023. In commune elections on 5 June 2022, the Candlelight Party won 22% of the popular vote against 74% for the CPP. The election results established the Candlelight Party as Cambodia’s main opposition party.

The ambiguous election results hit a sweet spot, temporarily lowering the risk of party dissolution. In the wake of the elections, the CPP continued to rely on legal strategies to weaken the Candlelight Party—seeking first to dissuade any contestation of election results and second to sever bonds with its popular founder, Sam Rainsy. In parallel, the CPP continued its campaign against the dissolved Cambodia National Rescue Party. Three mass trials were completed, each of which saw dozens of party leaders and activists convicted on conspiracy charges.

Despite, or because of, the stifling political landscape, a labour conflict at Phnom Penh’s NagaWorld casino became a visible disturbance in the capital’s centre—in November, Chhim Sithar, president of the striking union, was re-arrested and sent to pre-trial detention.

On its third outing as chair of ASEAN, Cambodia pushed for direct engagement with Myanmar’s military government. This was Hun Sen’s attempt to transpose what he considered to be his political legacy of peacemaking onto the global stage. In January last year, Hun Sen was the first head of government to visit Naypyidaw since the February 2021 coup, to push for the implementation of ASEAN’s five-point consensus. But as the year wore on, the junta proved itself impervious to Hun Sen’s masterplan.

Russia’s war in Ukraine brought Hun Sen and his government the recognition they had sought in Myanmar. Surprising all, Cambodia took a pro-Ukrainian stance on the orders of Hun Sen. This earned Cambodia the reinvigorated friendship of Western countries after the chilling of relations that followed 2017’s political crackdown. In December, on a trip to co-chair the first ASEAN–EU commemorative summit in Brussels, Hun Sen was warmly received by French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris—severely undermining exiled opposition leader Rainsy’s claim to the support of the international community.

As the electoral term drew to a close, the feat of the Cambodian government became clear—it had dramatically increased the acceptance and even popularity of what had been an unpopular government over the dissolution of the CNRP at the beginning of its term.

With serious international and domestic challenges absent, the end of the neak tosour era amounted only to the end of the beginning for the regenerated CPP.

The implications of Australia’s strategic update for Cambodia

On 1 July, Australia unveiled its 2020 defence strategic update, which redefines the country’s strategic priorities and its response to the rapidly evolving regional security landscape. From Cambodia’s point of view, two key components in the revised defence policy warrant mentioning.

The first is Australia’s plan to direct greater attention and resources to its immediate region, ‘ranging from the north-eastern Indian Ocean, through maritime and mainland Southeast Asia to Papua New Guinea and the South West Pacific’. The update aims to shape Australia’s strategic environment, to deter actions against its interests, and to respond to threats with credible force.

To attain this goal, Canberra has committed $270 billion over the next decade to boost the capabilities of the Australian Defence Force. The update has a strong focus on offensive capabilities in the land, maritime, air, space and cyber domains. That will include acquisitions of long-range combat systems, such as Lockheed Martin’s AGM-158C long-range anti-ship missile, or LRASM, and hypersonic weapon programs, which will increase the costs for adversaries planning to attack Australia and deter those threatening its interests.

Viewed from Cambodia, the update’s second key aspect is its grim assessment of the deteriorating security landscape in the Indo-Pacific. As the United States and the People’s Republic of China ramp up their strategic competition, Australia sees stability declining ‘more rapidly than anticipated’ and considers the prospect of a high-intensity interstate conflict ‘unlikely’ but ‘less remote’ than four years ago.

This disturbing assessment provides a signal to Cambodian leaders about the risks and challenges lying ahead of them.

Cambodia may well entertain the notion that the US and China are engaging in a Cold War–style strategic contest in Asia. Rhetoric between leaders in Washington and Beijing, inflamed by the Covid-19 pandemic, a shift in the US’s position in the South China Sea maritime disputes, and China’s increasingly aggressive foreign policy and military postures around the world, seems to have pushed the trajectory of their bilateral relationship towards more hostile territory. Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has warned that Southeast Asia may need to choose between Washington and Beijing. Given what has occurred so far in 2020, that may happen sooner than expected.

The most viable foreign policy option for Cambodia is to continue to promote a rules-based regional order that embraces not only the US and China but also middle powers such as Australia to keep the Indo-Pacific free of great-power competition and open to free trade, cooperation and peace. This can be done bilaterally with foreign partners and multilaterally through regional platforms led by the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. The ASEAN Defence Ministers’ Meeting is one forum in which Cambodia can act collectively with fellow member states to engage in regional security dialogues, promote practical partnerships in military and non-military areas, and build confidence and lessen the risk of miscalculations.

The update recognises the erratic, if not declining, nature of the US presence in the Indo-Pacific, especially under President Donald Trump. Even though it’s a US ally, Australia realises the need to be able to deter threats against its interests.

Cambodia should view the update as a sign of Australia’s determination to uphold a rules-based regional order, from which the region can benefit diplomatically and economically. Phnom Penh should step up its political, economic and military engagement with Canberra to ensure that this middle power remains a robust contributor to a liberal international order in Asia.

This does not necessarily mean that Cambodia should side with Australia and its US ally against China. As a small state, Cambodia should continue to hedge by concurrently engaging multiple external partners through pragmatic cooperation on issues of shared interest, candid assessment of policy differences, people-to-people exchanges, partnerships between academic and policy communities, and governmental dialogues.

In the update, Australia has indicated a bold and long-term interest in maintaining a stable, peaceful and prosperous Indo-Pacific in which big, middle and small powers can co-exist peacefully. Cambodia should view the revised policy as an opportunity to invigorate its bilateral ties with Australia and, through ASEAN, engage this middle power deeper into regional security structures. A militarily capable and regionally involved Australia is critical for Cambodia’s foreign policy and for the future of stability and peace in the Indo-Pacific.

China’s Cambodia gambit

The news that China and Cambodia may have signed a secret agreement for Beijing to have long-term control over part of Cambodia’s Ream naval base, with the right to base People’s Liberation Army naval vessels, military supplies and personnel, has caused a spike of concern about China’s growing military presence across the ASEAN region. As regional expert Carlyle Thayer has observed: ‘China is likely to establish a military foothold in Cambodia as a result of a gradual process whose pace will be determined by the amount of political resistance in Cambodia and the region.’

The agreement is for 30 years, with automatic renewals every 10 years after that.

Concerns have also been expressed about China’s ability to exploit the nearby Dara Sakor international airport, being built by China’s Union Development Group. It’s located in the middle of the Cambodian jungle in the Koh Kong region, and the runway is clearly being designed to support large military aircraft as well as fighter aircraft.

The naval base and airport add to the 20% of Cambodia’s coastline now leased to Chinese companies, and make possible further Chinese military expansion at the expense of Cambodian citizens and sovereignty.

The leaked agreement reinforces the broadly held view that Cambodia has slipped further into Beijing’s strategic orbit. Thayer argues that the Ream project is indicative of a broader trend which sees Cambodia’s Prime Minister Hun Sen make ‘a compact with the devil to ensure his regime’s survival’. He argues that that bargain will lead to Hun Sen ultimately ceding control on decisions involving China’s economic presence in Cambodia to Beijing, noting that, ‘Cambodia is no longer a sovereign actor; it may make requests for Chinese assistance, but it is China that determines what projects are funded and which projects are not.’

A key factor behind the agreement is China’s debt-trap diplomacy driven by its Belt and Road Initiative. Hun Sen has accepted substantial Chinese aid as part of signing up to the BRI, including US$600 million in loans, and Beijing has offered a further US$2 billion to enable it to build road and rail networks across Cambodia.

The combination of Chinese economic loans and Chinese-built ports, airports, and road and rail links across Indochina not only gives Beijing strategic influence and enables it to coerce its neighbours into virtual vassal status, but also enhances the PLA’s mobility and, ultimately, allows a forward strategic presence for China’s military.

This is what the BRI is all about. It’s far from being a ‘win–win’ outcome through interdependent development that benefits all. Instead, it’s simply a win for a rising hegemonic China that seeks to reassert its role as a 21st-century Middle Kingdom.

An expanding Chinese military presence in Cambodia is a game-changer for the security interests of ASEAN. ASEAN was conceived to enhance regional resilience, but any Chinese military facility—even a dual-use facility—is likely to be a disintegrative factor because it could potentially facilitate external military coercion against member states.

The most immediate impact of Chinese access to Ream would be on the unresolved maritime territorial dispute between Cambodia and Thailand generated by differences over a border agreement dating back to 1907, and the potential for Chinese access to oil and natural gas deposits in the disputed region. The presence of Chinese naval forces operating from Ream will alarm Thailand and raises the prospect of Chinese interference in the dispute.

PLA Navy vessels—or well-armed quasi-military forces such as the Chinese Coast Guard and maritime militia—could adopt a more assertive profile on the high seas in the Gulf of Thailand, and into the South China Sea.

Chinese naval forces deploying out of Ream could, for example, patrol near the Natuna Islands to protect illegal Chinese fishing activities, which have been challenged by Indonesia in the past. It may also encourage China to more aggressively assert that the so-called nine-dash line extends south of these Indonesian territories. If that action was supported by the PLA Air Force, Indonesia’s ability to respond to illegal fishing around the islands would become more challenging. Charles Edel notes that:

If you have a naval base in Cambodia, it means the Chinese Navy has a more favorable operational environment in the waters surrounding Southeast Asia … You have all of a sudden a mainland Southeast Asia potentially sitting behind a defensive Chinese military perimeter. This is by far the biggest implication.

Vietnam would certainly feel the pressure. Ream is about 100 kilometres from the Vietnam–Cambodia border, and Chinese warships could operate south of Vietnam before turning northeast to support Chinese activities along the Vietnamese coast in the disputed Spratly and Paracel island chains. In the air, the combat radius of PLA Air Force J-10Cs flying from Dara Sakor, using internal fuel, would bring all of Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore within range, as well as parts of Indonesia and Myanmar.

A Chinese military base in Cambodia could also give China a greater ability to choke off maritime trade flows in any future blockade of Taiwan as a prelude to a Chinese invasion in coming years. Conversely, it would increase China’s chances of breaking a US-imposed distant blockade in such a scenario, denying the US and its allies—including Australia—an ability to operate unmolested across maritime Southeast Asia.

A Chinese military base hosted in the middle of ASEAN is a tangible wedge into ASEAN solidarity and security. If ASEAN is to remain an effective grouping, its other member states must act to prevent Cambodia from undermining their collective security through this secret basing agreement.

Cambodia’s move supports China’s ability to project maritime power along the maritime silk road into the far seas and oceans of the Indian Ocean. It acts as the next ‘pearl’ along what is now clearly emerging as a genuine ‘string of pearls’ that begins with Djibouti and extends through Gwadar in Pakistan, Hambantota in Sri Lanka, and now Ream in Cambodia. Each facility is adjacent to vital maritime choke points or astride critical sea lanes of communication.

Alfred Thayer Mahan would argue that sea power is inherently a means to economic dominance and thus political influence. In Red Star over the Pacific, Toshi Yoshihara and James Holmes note that a Mahanian approach to sea power starts by recognising ‘the necessity to secure commerce, by political measures conducive to military or naval strength … [M]ilitary access constitutes a guarantor of diplomatic access, while diplomatic access backed by military force is necessary to ensure commercial access and the economic blessings it bestows.’

Possessing forward bases like Ream means that Beijing will be far better placed to control the critical economic heartland of the planet that is centred around maritime Southeast Asia, keeping the sinews of global maritime commerce through this vital region firmly in its grip.

Fault lines in Cambodia

Image courtesy of Flickr user Michael Coghlan

It’s almost 20 years since Cambodia’s last military coup, but the country’s domestic security situation remains fragile. Over the last two years a number of events hint that the political and security situation in this Mekong state may be taking a turn for the worse.

While this trend is at a very early stage, Cambodia’s modern history demonstrate how quickly the nation’s security environment can change. In an already fragile state, even small events can act as fault lines leading to an increasingly unstable Cambodia in the run up to its 2018 election.

Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen’s praetorian guard are now operating numerous prepared defensive positions in and around central Phnom Penh. These troops are well trained, well-armed and fiercely loyal to the Prime Minister. In the riverside tourist district, more conventional government security forces carry assault rifles, ready for any potential unrest. There is an air of uncertainty that arises from such visible security measures. More worrisome still, is that for the first time in many years men in civilian clothing are increasingly being seen in Phnom Penh carrying AK-47 rifles.

Recent conversations with government officials, diplomats and expatriates alike consistently revealed a great deal of concern over Cambodia’s future. Their concerns focused on a climate of increasing political uncertainty and Hun Sen’s possible reaction to political challenges or civil unrest.

Hun Sen has maintained his political power for over 31 years through a combination of charisma, power broking, influence and the application of ruthless force. He has survived Pol Pot, the Khmer Rouge, Vietnamese occupation of Cambodia, the United Nations and FUNCINPEC. He worked with the United Nations through the nineties to introduce enough democratic change in Cambodia to remove the country from the international agenda. But that change has always been a thin veneer for his autocracy and grand plans for a dynasty like that of Singaporean statesman Lee Kuan Yew.

As the security situation in Cambodia stabilised after the 1997 coup, Hun Sen recognised that a new kind of power and influence was needed to maintain control over the nation. With increased physical security, Cambodians wanted greater economic security: and with a reduced international presence Hun Sen traded influence with business leaders.

Hun Sen modified his traditional autocratic network of military and political elite to include friends from the private sector. The reality of those newfound business friends was different to what was promised to the nation. Whilst Cambodia’s natural resources, such as timber, were quickly exploited little benefit was received by the average citizen. The growing divide between rich and poor in Cambodia, along with systemic corruption and the sale of influence have been contributing factors in the erosion of Hun Sen’s popular support.

Hun Sen has made it clear that he intends to stay in power for at least another 14 years, after which it’s rumored that he has plans for his son, Han Manet, to assume power. And through his network of influence and natural charisma he had, until the 2013 elections, maintained popular support.

Hun Sen’s declining popularity will likely see increasing challenges to his autocratic power. The consequences of such challenges are also likely to be bloody, as was seen in January 2014 when four unarmed anti-government protesters were shot dead, and 20 others wounded, by his personal guard force. Add to the mix the increasing military presence in Phnom Penh and further violence in Cambodia’s near future seems almost inevitable. But given the strength of his power, influence and networks, a coup against Hun Sen is unlikely to be successful for the foreseeable future.

A failed coup, or ongoing civil disturbances in Cambodia could endanger the wider stability of the greater Mekong region: more specifically Laos and Myanmar. Finding a release valve for this increasing domestic security pressure is no easy task. It’s clear that ASEAN will avoid getting involved in matters of domestic security, out of respect for Cambodia’s sovereignty. Cambodia’s ongoing diplomatic disputes with its neighbors Vietnam and Thailand rule out their bilateral involvement as well.

As a major aid donor and regional neighbor, Australia has a significant interest in trying to defuse the situation. Given France’s long-term political and social links with Cambodia, it’s an obvious partner for Australia.

France and Australia already make significant contributions to aid projects in Cambodia focused on supporting the millennial development goals. Given the nature of the emerging fault lines in Cambodia there are three additional development assistance focal points worthy of Australia and France’s consideration.

The first involves projects targeted at delivering improvements to the rule of law in Cambodia, with specific focus on police and military reforms. At an operational level that could include increasing the public order response capability of the Cambodian police and military. The second involves providing much needed support to Cambodia for the implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption. The successful implementation of the UNCAC articles will provide much needed anti-corruption and bribery measures.

Finally, there needs to be substantial aid investment in improving public sector accountability in Cambodia. Such projects need to focus on the development of regulatory and compliance frameworks.

Cambodia is no longer the dangerous frontier land it once was some 20 years ago. A growing sense of dissatisfaction with Hun Sen’s autocratic regime is now placing all of Cambodia’s success to date at risk.  There are already very clear fault lines forming in Cambodia, and without early intervention the post 2018 election period is likely to be another bloody period in the country’s history.

Cambodia’s ‘postponed’ exercises and the US pivot to Asia

REAM, Cambodia (Oct. 22, 2012) Rear Adm. Tom Carney, commander of Task Force 73, salutes Royal Cambodian naval officers at the Ream Navy Base during Cooperation Afloat Readiness and Training (CARAT) Cambodia 2012. CARAT is a series of bilateral military exercises between the U.S. Navy and the armed forces of Bangladesh, Brunei, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Timor Leste.

Cambodia’s recent suspension or ‘postponement’ of military exercises with the United States has in some ways come as a surprise and in another sense isn’t surprising at all. For several years Cambodia has been ‘playing the field’, seeking to capitalise on its relations with China and the US, among others, to best suit its interests. Only this time, Hun Sen may feel he has greater leeway than ever before in snubbing the Americans without worrying much about negative consequences.

Cambodia has long been a beneficiary of Chinese largesse, in part because of China’s antipathy towards Vietnam dating back to before the Sino-Vietnamese War of 1979. Today, the bonds between them are closer and stronger than ever. China is Cambodia’s top foreign investor, a major donor (outstripping the United States in investment and aid several times over) and an increasingly important trading partner. In recent years, China has been assisting with training matters and provision of defence equipment but with no strings attached other than a requirement to be supportive of China in international affairs. The Chinese Foreign Minister’s visit to Cambodia on 21 August, marking the 55th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations, adds symbolism and substance to the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership of Cooperation between the two countries in 2010.

China has emerged as Cambodia’s most significant military benefactor, recently signing a memorandum of understanding on military training, helping to significantly expand the Cambodian forces’ training capabilities, hosting dozens of Cambodian military students on courses in China and providing a range of significant items of military equipment including helicopters. Last year, Cambodia duly complied with China’s bidding in blocking a resolution at the ASEAN Summit which could have proven to be inimical to China’s claims over the South China Sea and its desire for dealing bilaterally rather than multilaterally with respective rival claimants. After all, China has a much stronger position over the South China Sea if it can keep the affected ASEAN countries from acting collectively and particularly from acting with the full support of a united ASEAN. Read more